NO 1.409 H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be disproven:



HASKELL
  ↳ LR

mainModule Main
  ((blockIO :: ((a  ->  IOResult ->  IO () ->  IO a) :: ((a  ->  IOResult ->  IO () ->  IO a)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Lambda Reductions:
The following Lambda expression
\fsHugs_BlockThread (s . fromObjm'

is transformed to
blockIO0 f s = Hugs_BlockThread (s . fromObjm'



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
HASKELL
      ↳ BR

mainModule Main
  ((blockIO :: ((a  ->  IOResult ->  IO () ->  IO a) :: ((a  ->  IOResult ->  IO () ->  IO a)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.

↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
HASKELL
          ↳ COR

mainModule Main
  ((blockIO :: ((a  ->  IOResult ->  IO () ->  IO a) :: ((a  ->  IOResult ->  IO () ->  IO a)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
undefined 
 | False
 = undefined

is transformed to
undefined  = undefined1

undefined0 True = undefined

undefined1  = undefined0 False



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ COR
HASKELL
              ↳ LetRed

mainModule Main
  ((blockIO :: ((a  ->  IOResult ->  IO () ->  IO a) :: ((a  ->  IOResult ->  IO () ->  IO a)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Let/Where Reductions:
The bindings of the following Let/Where expression
IO blockIO0
where 
blockIO0 f s = Hugs_BlockThread (s . fromObjm'
m' k = threadToIOResult (m (k . toObj))

are unpacked to the following functions on top level
blockIOBlockIO0 vy f s = Hugs_BlockThread (s . fromObj) (blockIOM' vy)

blockIOM' vy k = threadToIOResult (vy (k . toObj))



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ COR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ LetRed
HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow
                  ↳ Narrow

mainModule Main
  (blockIO :: ((a  ->  IOResult ->  IO () ->  IO a)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Haskell To QDPs


↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ COR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ LetRed
                ↳ HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow
                    ↳ AND
QDP
                        ↳ NonTerminationProof
                      ↳ QDP
                  ↳ Narrow

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_toObj(vz9, ba) → new_toObj(vz9, ba)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.

The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_toObj(vz9, ba) → new_toObj(vz9, ba)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:none


s = new_toObj(vz9, ba) evaluates to t =new_toObj(vz9, ba)

Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:




Rewriting sequence

The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_toObj(vz9, ba) to new_toObj(vz9, ba).





↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ COR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ LetRed
                ↳ HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow
                    ↳ AND
                      ↳ QDP
QDP
                        ↳ NonTerminationProof
                  ↳ Narrow

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_fromObj(vz6, ba) → new_fromObj(vz6, ba)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.

The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_fromObj(vz6, ba) → new_fromObj(vz6, ba)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:none


s = new_fromObj(vz6, ba) evaluates to t =new_fromObj(vz6, ba)

Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:




Rewriting sequence

The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_fromObj(vz6, ba) to new_fromObj(vz6, ba).




Haskell To QDPs


↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ COR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ LetRed
                ↳ HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow
                  ↳ Narrow
QDP
                      ↳ NonTerminationProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_fromObj(vz6, ba, []) → new_fromObj(vz6, ba, [])

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.

The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_fromObj(vz6, ba, []) → new_fromObj(vz6, ba, [])

The TRS R consists of the following rules:none


s = new_fromObj(vz6, ba, []) evaluates to t =new_fromObj(vz6, ba, [])

Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:




Rewriting sequence

The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_fromObj(vz6, ba, []) to new_fromObj(vz6, ba, []).